How We Rate

Transparency is the cornerstone of our editorial process. At computersplusmi.com, we believe that beginners deserve a clear, objective understanding of how an operator performs before they decide to sign up. We do not accept payment for positive reviews; instead, we may earn an affiliate commission if you choose to visit a site through our links. This relationship does not influence our scoring, as our reviews are based on a strict, weighted rubric designed to prioritize player security over flashy marketing.

In our opinion, a high score should reflect a balance of reliability, fairness, and user experience. Because gambling always carries inherent financial risk, our methodology focuses heavily on licensing and responsible gambling tools to help users make informed decisions.

The Scoring Rubric

We evaluate each operator across seven core categories. Each category is assigned a weight based on its importance to the overall player experience. Based on our methodology, the final score is a weighted average of these components.

1. Licensing & Regulation (30%)

This is the most critical factor. We believe that without a valid license from a recognized authority, a casino cannot be considered reliable.

Verification of active license (MGA, UKGC, Curacao, etc.): 10%
Transparency of ownership and corporate history: 5%
Compliance with local jurisdictional laws: 10%
Presence of audited RNG (Random Number Generator) certificates: 5%

2. Security & Fairness (20%)

We look for technical safeguards that protect user data and ensure game outcomes are random.

SSL encryption standards for data transmission: 5%
Two-factor authentication (2FA) availability: 5%
Privacy policy clarity and data handling: 5%
Publicly available payout percentages (RTP) for games: 5%

3. Responsible Gambling Tools (15%)

Responsible gambling is not optional; it is a necessity. We penalize sites that hide their help tools.

Availability of deposit limits (daily, weekly, monthly): 5%
Ease of access to "Self-Exclusion" and "Cool-off" tools: 5%
Links to independent support organizations: 3%
Prominence of RG warnings on the homepage: 2%

4. Payouts & Banking (15%)

We examine how easily a player can move their funds in and out of the account.

Variety of payment methods (e-wallets, cards, crypto): 3%
Clarity of withdrawal timelines and processing speeds: 4%
Fairness of withdrawal limits: 4%
Transparency of transaction fees: 4%

5. Game Library & Software (10%)

While variety is great, we prioritize the quality and fairness of the providers.

Presence of reputable software providers (e.g., NetEnt, Microgaming): 3%
Diversity of game types (Slots, Table Games, Live Dealer): 3%
Mobile compatibility and app performance: 2%
Availability of demo modes for beginners: 2%

6. Bonuses & Terms (5%)

We ignore the "headline" number and look at the fine print. A large bonus with impossible wagering requirements is, in our opinion, less valuable than a small, fair one.

Fairness of wagering requirements: 2%
Clarity of Terms and Conditions (T&Cs): 2%
Reasonableness of maximum bonus conversion limits: 1%

7. Customer Support (5%)

We test the support channels to see if they are helpful and responsive.

Availability of 24/7 Live Chat: 2%
Responsiveness via email: 2%
Quality of the Help/FAQ section: 1%

Our Testing Process

Our team doesn't just read a website's "About Us" page. We create accounts, deposit small amounts of our own capital, and attempt to withdraw funds to verify that the process works as advertised.

Based on our review process, we look for "red flags" that could lead to an automatic failure, regardless of the score. These include hidden fees, contradictory T&Cs, or a lack of verifiable licensing. If a site fails our core security check, it may be excluded from our recommendations entirely.

Contact & Privacy

If you have questions regarding our methodology or wish to exercise your data rights under our privacy policy, you may contact our Data Protection Officer at [email protected].